Triple
T35386879
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jelectro |
E1022813
|
entity |
| Predicate | harmOnContact |
P182917
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Jelectro, harmOnContact, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: harmOnContact Context triple: [Jelectro, harmOnContact, yes]
-
A.
dangerousWhen
Indicates that one entity becomes harmful, risky, or unsafe under the conditions or in the presence of another entity or situation.
-
B.
recognizedHarm
Indicates that an entity has identified or acknowledged the existence or occurrence of harm affecting another entity or situation.
-
C.
threatToHumans
Indicates that the subject poses or represents a potential danger, harm, or risk to humans.
-
D.
isHazardTo
Indicates that one entity poses a potential source of danger, harm, or risk to another entity.
-
E.
damageTo
Indicates a relationship where one entity causes harm, loss, or deterioration to another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76df34ba48190bd80f0814cdcd540 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f794f649648190a79d90e6e67fe2dc |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:33 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7910770108190bdd39ddb5d304f54 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:16 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f791cad5e08190a8a04ca283dbecaa |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:19 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:03 p.m.