Triple
T3538623
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bracer Phoenix |
E74827
|
entity |
| Predicate | defensiveCapability |
P48207
|
FINISHED |
| Object | high durability |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: high durability | Statement: [Bracer Phoenix, defensiveCapability, high durability]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: defensiveCapability Context triple: [Bracer Phoenix, defensiveCapability, high durability]
-
A.
warfareCapability
Indicates the ability or capacity of an entity to engage in, conduct, or support acts of warfare.
-
B.
defenseForces
Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as the military or protective force responsible for defending another entity.
-
C.
weaponCapability
Indicates that one entity has the ability to use, deploy, or function as a weapon against another entity or target.
-
D.
defensiveOperation
Indicates actions or measures undertaken to protect, guard, or defend a target against threats or attacks.
-
E.
canBeDefendedIn
Indicates that something (such as a claim, action, or position) is capable of being justified or supported within a specified context, forum, or framework.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85d274cc8190ab59c97298a1cfbf |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adbcca5e008190abcfe40c8902a95f |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adae13ab808190a5d6ecdc7543445e |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:12 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69adaed7f2ec819085467d281712e0e8 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:16 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:20 p.m.