Triple

T35385203
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tanauan, Leyte E1022770 entity
Predicate isDisasterProneArea P44599 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Tanauan, Leyte, isDisasterProneArea, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isDisasterProneArea
Context triple: [Tanauan, Leyte, isDisasterProneArea, true]
  • A. hasNaturalHazardRisk chosen
    Indicates that an entity is exposed or subject to potential damage or impact from one or more natural hazards (e.g., earthquakes, floods, storms).
  • B. geologicalHazardZoneFor
    Indicates a relationship where a specified area or zone is identified as being at risk from a particular geological hazard (such as earthquakes, landslides, or volcanic activity).
  • C. disasterLocation
    Indicates the place where a disaster occurs or has its primary impact.
  • D. hasCoastalRisk
    Indicates that an entity is exposed to potential hazards or adverse impacts associated with coastal environments, such as flooding, erosion, or storm surge.
  • E. hasAvalancheRisk
    Indicates that there is a potential or assessed danger of an avalanche occurring in relation to the referenced entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76df28d8c819089f2c5799fe7d079 completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f794f50080819095ff3c2cefc74fea completed May 3, 2026, 6:33 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7910770108190bdd39ddb5d304f54 completed May 3, 2026, 6:16 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:03 p.m.