Triple
T35362090
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Amy Adams as Anna Brady |
E1021516
|
entity |
| Predicate | laterProposesTo |
P202243
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Declan O’Callaghan |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Declan O’Callaghan | Statement: [Amy Adams as Anna Brady, laterProposesTo, Declan O’Callaghan]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: laterProposesTo Context triple: [Amy Adams as Anna Brady, laterProposesTo, Declan O’Callaghan]
-
A.
laterLeader
Indicates that one entity serves as a leader or holds a leadership role at a later time than another specified leader.
-
B.
laterConsensus
Indicates that a consensus or agreed-upon position is reached at a time later than a previously considered or initial consensus.
-
C.
hasProposed
Indicates that one entity has formally suggested or put forward something (such as an idea, plan, or offer) to another entity for consideration or acceptance.
-
D.
appointedOnProposalOf
Indicates that one entity is appointed as a result of, or based on, a proposal formally made by another entity.
-
E.
hasLaterProponent
Indicates that an idea, theory, or position was subsequently supported or advocated by a later individual or group.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76def44c881908a20e8008572eb44 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a0064f8efa48190956287f548a8057d |
completed | May 10, 2026, 10:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a006471e75c8190adae99bd75e7411b |
completed | May 10, 2026, 10:56 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a0064f8496081908ac3bb4c53ed08aa |
completed | May 10, 2026, 10:59 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:03 p.m.