Triple

T35359310
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hall of Fame Racing E1021427 entity
Predicate hadTechnicalAllianceWith P183055 FINISHED
Object Joe Gibbs Racing NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Joe Gibbs Racing | Statement: [Hall of Fame Racing, hadTechnicalAllianceWith, Joe Gibbs Racing]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hadTechnicalAllianceWith
Context triple: [Hall of Fame Racing, hadTechnicalAllianceWith, Joe Gibbs Racing]
  • A. soughtAllianceWith
    Indicates that one entity actively attempted to form an alliance or cooperative partnership with another entity.
  • B. beganStrategicAllianceWith
    Indicates that one entity initiated the formation of a strategic alliance or long-term cooperative partnership with another entity.
  • C. hasBrokenAllianceWith
    Indicates that a previously established alliance or partnership between two entities has been ended or violated by at least one of them.
  • D. oftenAlliedWith
    Indicates that one entity is frequently or habitually allied or aligned in cooperation with another entity.
  • E. hasPoliticalAlly
    Indicates that one entity supports and cooperates with another in a political context, treating them as an ally in political activities or objectives.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76def44c881908a20e8008572eb44 completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f795b5228c8190adb5bf86e581f70c completed May 3, 2026, 6:36 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f79104f5b48190a496cdffde8472da completed May 3, 2026, 6:16 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f79527c7bc8190a69d87bec01f65c8 completed May 3, 2026, 6:34 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:03 p.m.