Triple
T3532330
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Party of Regions |
E74687
|
entity |
| Predicate | parliamentaryDominance |
P19538
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2000s |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2000s | Statement: [Party of Regions, parliamentaryDominance, 2000s]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: parliamentaryDominance Context triple: [Party of Regions, parliamentaryDominance, 2000s]
-
A.
ParliamentarianSide
Indicates that one entity is aligned with, represents, or belongs to the Parliamentarian side in a political or legislative context.
-
B.
parliamentaryMajorityType
Indicates the type or nature of the majority held in a parliamentary body (e.g., absolute, simple, qualified) in relation to a given context or decision.
-
C.
parliamentaryHouse
Indicates that one entity functions as a parliamentary chamber or house within the legislative system of another entity.
-
D.
ParliamentarianForceStrength
Indicates the magnitude or level of military or coercive power held or deployed by a parliamentary or legislature-aligned force in a given context.
-
E.
dominantPartySystem
chosen
Indicates a political system in which one party consistently dominates governance over time, despite the presence of other legally allowed parties.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85d1a3948190931fd1ea1f49717b |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adbc9a14c881908932b17ed3eececb |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adae13ab808190a5d6ecdc7543445e |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:12 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:19 p.m.