Triple
T35323137
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | J Dillalude |
E1020099
|
entity |
| Predicate | musicalHomageTo |
P160609
|
FINISHED |
| Object | J Dilla |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: J Dilla | Statement: [J Dillalude, musicalHomageTo, J Dilla]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: musicalHomageTo Context triple: [J Dillalude, musicalHomageTo, J Dilla]
-
A.
paysHomageTo
Indicates that one entity formally shows respect, reverence, or honor toward another, often acknowledging its superiority, influence, or authority.
-
B.
inspiredSong
Indicates that one entity (such as an event, person, or work) served as the creative inspiration or motivating influence for the creation of a particular song.
-
C.
homageToComposer
chosen
Indicates that one entity pays tribute or respect to a composer, often by referencing, honoring, or being inspired by their work.
-
D.
musicalDepictionOf
Indicates that one entity is a musical work that artistically represents, portrays, or is inspired by another entity.
-
E.
coverArtHomageTo
Indicates that one piece of cover art is intentionally designed as an homage or stylistic tribute to another specific cover art.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76de9d45c81908a2ed0956b448b65 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fddf721c1481909301a0f379368f10 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:04 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fddda1ae7c8190b5848ff9a9e39826 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 12:57 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:03 p.m.