Triple

T35299690
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tunny cipher E1019469 entity
Predicate breakingMethod P182707 FINISHED
Object mathematical analysis LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mathematical analysis | Statement: [Tunny cipher, breakingMethod, mathematical analysis]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: breakingMethod
Context triple: [Tunny cipher, breakingMethod, mathematical analysis]
  • A. breakDirection
    Indicates the direction in which something breaks, splits, or fractures relative to a reference point or orientation.
  • B. breakType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of break or interruption that occurs in a process, activity, or sequence.
  • C. breaksWith
    Indicates that one entity ends or disrupts an existing association, agreement, or alignment with another entity.
  • D. brokenBy
    Indicates that one entity causes the damage, destruction, or loss of functionality of another entity.
  • E. brokenOn
    Indicates that an object or system ceased functioning or became damaged at a specific time or on a specific date.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76de7eedc8190a3bdc64ebbc05b42 completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7904a770481908ef3f788e51e8dba completed May 3, 2026, 6:13 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f78e2f52e08190a77661223a96c601 completed May 3, 2026, 6:04 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f78f629d508190b755848162c4e101 completed May 3, 2026, 6:09 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:03 p.m.