Triple
T35298562
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Moiraine Damodred |
E1019442
|
entity |
| Predicate | bondedWarders |
P68132
|
FINISHED |
| Object | al'Lan Mandragoran |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: al'Lan Mandragoran | Statement: [Moiraine Damodred, bondedWarders, al'Lan Mandragoran]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: bondedWarders Context triple: [Moiraine Damodred, bondedWarders, al'Lan Mandragoran]
-
A.
wargBond
Indicates a special bond or partnership between a warg and another entity, typically involving loyalty, cooperation, or shared purpose.
-
B.
hasWarden
Indicates that one entity serves as the warden or supervisory authority responsible for another entity.
-
C.
bondedWith
chosen
Indicates that two entities are joined by a strong, enduring connection or attachment, whether emotional, social, or structural.
-
D.
isWardOf
Indicates that one entity is under the guardianship, protection, or legal care of another entity as their ward.
-
E.
protectors
Indicates a relationship where one entity actively safeguards, defends, or shields another from harm, danger, or adverse effects.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76de7eedc8190a3bdc64ebbc05b42 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7901f599c8190941cb23c676c883d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f78e2f52e08190a77661223a96c601 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:04 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:03 p.m.