Triple
T35281350
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Memorymoog |
E1018940
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasChordMemory |
P198202
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Memorymoog, hasChordMemory, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasChordMemory Context triple: [Memorymoog, hasChordMemory, yes]
-
A.
usesChord
Indicates that one entity employs or incorporates a particular chord in its structure, performance, or composition.
-
B.
usesChordChangesOf
Indicates that one musical work employs the same or substantially similar chord progression as another work.
-
C.
hasChordProgressionType
Indicates that a musical piece, section, or passage exhibits a specific type or pattern of chord progression.
-
D.
hasMelody
Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is characterized by a particular melody.
-
E.
hasChorusHook
Indicates that a musical work features a prominent, recurring chorus section that serves as a memorable hook.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76de6d39c8190bb11342e4b91ff2b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fed09a12648190affcd9bacf7ca275 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:13 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fecf91d6f481908deb60c965c433ed |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:09 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fed098328c819085979de6b179b378 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:13 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:03 p.m.