Triple
T3526576
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Catalina Cortés |
E74552
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedDynastyOrHouse |
P7426
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Cortés lineage |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cortés lineage | Statement: [Catalina Cortés, associatedDynastyOrHouse, Cortés lineage]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedDynastyOrHouse Context triple: [Catalina Cortés, associatedDynastyOrHouse, Cortés lineage]
-
A.
associatedWithDynasty
chosen
Indicates that an entity has a historical, political, cultural, or familial connection to a specific dynasty.
-
B.
associatedNobleFamily
Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked or connected to a particular noble family, typically by heritage, allegiance, or formal association.
-
C.
dynasticBranch
Indicates a genealogical relationship where one lineage or house originates from, or is a subordinate offshoot of, a larger parent dynasty.
-
D.
dynasticOrigin
Indicates the historical dynasty or ruling family from which an entity originates or descends.
-
E.
dynasticAlliance
Indicates a formal union or cooperative relationship established between ruling families or dynasties, typically through marriage or treaty, to secure mutual political or strategic advantage.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85d0c5488190a3d8e02ebd01a1aa |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adbc6bb0748190bfccfe25d2ab41b7 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adae121a048190b03825a001d21f49 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:12 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:19 p.m.