Triple

T35237147
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Normalized Cuts for image segmentation E1017405 entity
Predicate graphMatrix P96954 FINISHED
Object affinity matrix LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: affinity matrix | Statement: [Normalized Cuts for image segmentation, graphMatrix, affinity matrix]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: graphMatrix
Context triple: [Normalized Cuts for image segmentation, graphMatrix, affinity matrix]
  • A. graphAnalogue
    Indicates that one entity serves as a graph-theoretic counterpart or structural analogue of another entity.
  • B. hasEdgeGraph
    Indicates that there is an edge (a direct connection or link) present within a graph between specified nodes or components.
  • C. dependencyGraph
    Indicates a relationship where one entity’s existence, behavior, or outcome depends on one or more other entities, forming a structured network of such dependencies.
  • D. associatedCayleyGraph
    Indicates that there is a Cayley graph constructed from, or corresponding to, the given algebraic structure or group.
  • E. usesGraphType chosen
    Indicates that one entity employs or is configured to operate with a specific type of graph representation or graph model.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76de235048190b990070c23c51b6b completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f78f63c8788190b253a18de5ca1312 completed May 3, 2026, 6:09 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f78e2d71248190b850c2802ec170c0 completed May 3, 2026, 6:04 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:02 p.m.