Triple
T35235075
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Family Affair |
E1017352
|
entity |
| Predicate | lyricsContain |
P114550
|
FINISHED |
| Object | hateration |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: hateration | Statement: [Family Affair, lyricsContain, hateration]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: lyricsContain Context triple: [Family Affair, lyricsContain, hateration]
-
A.
hasLyricsIn
Indicates that the lyrics of a work are written or available in a specified language.
-
B.
hasLyricsMentioning
chosen
Indicates that the referenced lyrics explicitly mention or refer to the specified entity.
-
C.
hasLyric
Indicates that one entity (typically a musical work or track) contains or is associated with the lyrics provided by another entity.
-
D.
lyricKeyword
Indicates that a lyric is associated with, or can be characterized by, a particular keyword or key phrase.
-
E.
originalLyricsContained
Indicates that the original lyrics of one entity are fully or partially included within another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76de12e4c8190bc46b71a32858356 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f79533b88c8190934ec4cb21770e24 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f79104f5b48190a496cdffde8472da |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:16 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:02 p.m.