Triple
T3522568
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | PCP theorem |
E74456
|
entity |
| Predicate | proofType |
P7024
|
FINISHED |
| Object | non-adaptive probabilistically checkable proofs |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: non-adaptive probabilistically checkable proofs | Statement: [PCP theorem, proofType, non-adaptive probabilistically checkable proofs]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: proofType Context triple: [PCP theorem, proofType, non-adaptive probabilistically checkable proofs]
-
A.
requiresProofOf
Indicates that one entity must provide formal evidence or documentation to validate or authorize another entity.
-
B.
proved
Indicates that one entity has demonstrated the truth or validity of another entity (such as a statement, theorem, or claim) through logical or evidential means.
-
C.
typicalProofUses
Indicates that a proof characteristically or commonly employs a particular method, technique, or component.
-
D.
hasProofMethod
chosen
Indicates that there exists a specific method or technique used to establish or demonstrate the validity of something (such as a statement, claim, or theorem).
-
E.
standardOfProof
Indicates the level or degree of certainty required to establish that a claim or allegation is true in a given context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85d0c5488190a3d8e02ebd01a1aa |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adbc4dd6d48190a5a3f4b86c82b86c |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adae121a048190b03825a001d21f49 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:12 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:19 p.m.