Triple
T35129584
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rule 35 – Summary Judgments |
E1014400
|
entity |
| Predicate | partialSummaryJudgmentEffect |
P92530
|
FINISHED |
| Object | resolves some but not all issues |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: resolves some but not all issues | Statement: [Rule 35 – Summary Judgments, partialSummaryJudgmentEffect, resolves some but not all issues]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: partialSummaryJudgmentEffect Context triple: [Rule 35 – Summary Judgments, partialSummaryJudgmentEffect, resolves some but not all issues]
-
A.
judgmentResult
Indicates the outcome or decision produced by a judgment, such as a court ruling, evaluation, or formal assessment, regarding the entities involved.
-
B.
leadingJudgmentBy
Indicates a relationship where one judgment or legal decision is treated as the primary or authoritative basis guiding or influencing another judgment.
-
C.
reasonForJudgment
Indicates that a particular reason, basis, or justification underlies or explains a given judgment or decision.
-
D.
outcomeSummary
chosen
Indicates a concise description or overview of the result or consequences of an action, event, or process.
-
E.
possibleJudgment
Indicates a potential or anticipated judgment, decision, or evaluative outcome that could be made about an entity or situation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dd9c1848190af70d4882a2c1ad7 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fbc36ce1f88190a7fa1656b714e107 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 10:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fbbd13595c81908719f52c3d37a7e8 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 10:13 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:02 p.m.