Triple

T35129497
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Rule 33 – Demurrer to Evidence E1014398 entity
Predicate legalConsequenceOfErrorInGrant P200478 FINISHED
Object possible reversal on appeal LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: possible reversal on appeal | Statement: [Rule 33 – Demurrer to Evidence, legalConsequenceOfErrorInGrant, possible reversal on appeal]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalConsequenceOfErrorInGrant
Context triple: [Rule 33 – Demurrer to Evidence, legalConsequenceOfErrorInGrant, possible reversal on appeal]
  • A. violationConsequences
    Indicates the negative outcomes, penalties, or repercussions that result from a violation of a rule, law, or agreement.
  • B. consequenceOfRevocation
    Indicates that something occurs as a direct result of a prior revocation event or decision.
  • C. legalConsequenceAvoided
    Indicates that an action, decision, or circumstance resulted in preventing or escaping an otherwise applicable legal penalty, liability, or sanction.
  • D. hasJurisdictionalConsequence
    Indicates that an action, decision, or fact results in a legal or administrative effect within a particular jurisdiction or authority.
  • E. effectOfGrant
    Indicates the outcome, impact, or change that results from a particular grant being given.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76dd8b6948190aaa32b081816bd94 completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff8cecbf048190860b9f72b8753f5c completed May 9, 2026, 7:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff8c4c39dc8190b5bf35adc1bae7c6 completed May 9, 2026, 7:34 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ff8cec1e4c8190b2d66b3e0f913bfd completed May 9, 2026, 7:37 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:02 p.m.