Triple
T35129487
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rule 33 – Demurrer to Evidence |
E1014398
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalEffectOfGrant |
P6506
|
FINISHED |
| Object | adjudication on the merits subject to appeal |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: adjudication on the merits subject to appeal | Statement: [Rule 33 – Demurrer to Evidence, legalEffectOfGrant, adjudication on the merits subject to appeal]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalEffectOfGrant Context triple: [Rule 33 – Demurrer to Evidence, legalEffectOfGrant, adjudication on the merits subject to appeal]
-
A.
effectOfGrant
Indicates the outcome, impact, or change that results from a particular grant being given.
-
B.
legalEffectIfAdopted
Indicates that a specified legal effect or consequence will occur if a particular proposal, rule, or measure is formally adopted.
-
C.
hasLegalEffect
chosen
Indicates that an action, document, or condition produces recognized legal consequences or enforceable rights and obligations.
-
D.
grantsStatusEffect
Indicates that one entity applies or bestows a specific status effect onto another entity.
-
E.
legalEffectOfAbrogation
Indicates the legal consequences or changes in rights and obligations that result from the abrogation (repeal or annulment) of a law, rule, or legal act.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dd8b6948190aaa32b081816bd94 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff8ba3f8248190bbdf8e7ec2b35093 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 7:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff8b41ba988190a7332e8317d10f09 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:02 p.m.