Triple

T35114422
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject "How do I love thee? Let me count the ways" E1013393 entity
Predicate rhymeSchemeOfPoem P8081 FINISHED
Object Petrarchan sonnet LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Petrarchan sonnet | Statement: ["How do I love thee? Let me count the ways", rhymeSchemeOfPoem, Petrarchan sonnet]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: rhymeSchemeOfPoem
Context triple: ["How do I love thee? Let me count the ways", rhymeSchemeOfPoem, Petrarchan sonnet]
  • A. rhymeScheme chosen
    Indicates the pattern of end sounds in a sequence of lines, showing which lines rhyme with each other.
  • B. rhymeSchemeParodied
    Indicates that one work imitates or mocks the rhyme scheme pattern of another work.
  • C. hasRhymeSchemeFeature
    Indicates that a poetic work exhibits a specific characteristic or pattern related to its rhyme scheme.
  • D. poeticStructure
    Indicates a relationship where one entity defines, embodies, or specifies the formal poetic organization (such as meter, rhyme scheme, or stanza pattern) used by another entity.
  • E. hasRhymeStyle
    Indicates that two linguistic elements share the same pattern or style of rhyming.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76dd659d08190bcdc00d37caafb62 completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f78ce78b508190955848e133398dc8 completed May 3, 2026, 5:59 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f78b8f4cc08190b49fccd798cb25d7 completed May 3, 2026, 5:53 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:01 p.m.