Triple
T35102884
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lycians |
E1013068
|
entity |
| Predicate | politicalInnovation |
P191705
|
FINISHED |
| Object | representative assembly of cities |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: representative assembly of cities | Statement: [Lycians, politicalInnovation, representative assembly of cities]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: politicalInnovation Context triple: [Lycians, politicalInnovation, representative assembly of cities]
-
A.
parliamentaryInnovation
Indicates that an entity introduces, supports, or is associated with new methods, practices, or reforms within a parliamentary or legislative system.
-
B.
politicalShift
Indicates a change in an entity’s political position, alignment, or governing structure over time.
-
C.
mainPoliticalDevelopment
Indicates the primary or most significant political change, event, or evolution affecting an entity within a given period or context.
-
D.
innovation
Indicates the introduction or development of something new or significantly improved compared to existing methods, products, or ideas.
-
E.
hasAdministrativeInnovation
chosen
Indicates a relationship where an entity introduces or possesses new or improved administrative methods, processes, or practices.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dd556248190808b4c4f43debebb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69feba0f09508190b3e871c62b19ec7f |
completed | May 9, 2026, 4:37 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69feb957fe7c8190969fb31a6d1a59c8 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 4:34 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:01 p.m.