Triple
T35085317
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Korte Verhandeling |
E1012558
|
entity |
| Predicate | developsIdeaLaterExpandedIn |
P18546
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ethics |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ethics | Statement: [Korte Verhandeling, developsIdeaLaterExpandedIn, Ethics]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: developsIdeaLaterExpandedIn Context triple: [Korte Verhandeling, developsIdeaLaterExpandedIn, Ethics]
-
A.
developsIdeasOf
Indicates that one entity creates, elaborates, or advances ideas that originate from or are associated with another entity.
-
B.
anticipatesIdeaIn
Indicates that one entity expects, predicts, or foresees the idea or concept that will be introduced or held by another entity in a given context.
-
C.
hasIdea
Indicates that an entity possesses, holds, or originates a particular idea.
-
D.
hasBrightIdea
Indicates that an entity conceives or possesses a clever, insightful, or innovative idea.
-
E.
successorInIdea
chosen
Indicates that one idea conceptually follows, develops from, or replaces another in a sequence of intellectual progression.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dd32c008190853aef6028f60208 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd4129a8848190a5002150278ac689 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:49 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd3e0515ec8190937c7af71ebc3875 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:36 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:01 p.m.