Triple

T35081402
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Within the Woods E1012446 entity
Predicate servedAsPrototypeFor P196688 FINISHED
Object The Evil Dead NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The Evil Dead | Statement: [Within the Woods, servedAsPrototypeFor, The Evil Dead]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: servedAsPrototypeFor
Context triple: [Within the Woods, servedAsPrototypeFor, The Evil Dead]
  • A. developedAsPrototypeFor chosen
    Indicates that one entity was created in an initial or experimental form specifically to test or serve as a preliminary version for another entity.
  • B. progenitorOf
    Indicates that one entity is the direct biological or ancestral source (parent or originator) of another entity.
  • C. hasPrototype
    Indicates that an entity is based on, derived from, or exemplified by a specific prototype.
  • D. isPrototypeOfClassUsedIn
    Indicates that one class serves as the prototype or template for another class that is used within a given context or system.
  • E. inheritedFrom
    Indicates that one entity has received or derived something (such as traits, rights, or property) from another entity, typically a predecessor or ancestor.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76dd32c008190853aef6028f60208 completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ffed8912488190baa05f572e5b1b89 completed May 10, 2026, 2:29 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ffed12a76c8190ad85c6ac869c72e9 completed May 10, 2026, 2:27 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:01 p.m.