Triple

T35078802
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Advocates (Scotland) E1012375 entity
Predicate canAcceptDirectAccessIn P54140 FINISHED
Object certain circumstances LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: certain circumstances | Statement: [Advocates (Scotland), canAcceptDirectAccessIn, certain circumstances]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canAcceptDirectAccessIn
Context triple: [Advocates (Scotland), canAcceptDirectAccessIn, certain circumstances]
  • A. mayDirect
    Indicates that one entity has the permission or authority to direct, manage, or oversee the actions or operations of another entity.
  • B. allowsIndividualAccess
    Indicates that one entity grants another entity permission to access something on an individual, per-person basis.
  • C. canAccedeTo chosen
    Indicates that one entity has the ability, permission, or right to gain access to or enter into another entity, resource, or state.
  • D. supportsCLIAccess
    Indicates that one entity enables or allows another entity to access a Command Line Interface (CLI).
  • E. canPass
    Indicates that one entity is able or permitted to move through, cross, or successfully traverse another entity or barrier.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76dd32c008190853aef6028f60208 completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f78ce78b508190955848e133398dc8 completed May 3, 2026, 5:59 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f78b8f4cc08190b49fccd798cb25d7 completed May 3, 2026, 5:53 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:01 p.m.