Triple
T35073541
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Division of Bennelong |
E1011946
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicalPartyStrength |
P8471
|
FINISHED |
| Object | traditionally Liberal-leaning |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: traditionally Liberal-leaning | Statement: [Division of Bennelong, historicalPartyStrength, traditionally Liberal-leaning]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicalPartyStrength Context triple: [Division of Bennelong, historicalPartyStrength, traditionally Liberal-leaning]
-
A.
estimatedPartisanStrength
Indicates an assessment or prediction of the degree of partisan support or political leaning associated with an entity or context.
-
B.
historicalDominantParties
chosen
Indicates that certain political parties have historically held dominant or ruling positions within a given political system or jurisdiction.
-
C.
historicalStrength
Indicates the relative power, influence, or effectiveness an entity possessed during a specified past period.
-
D.
historicalPower
Indicates that one entity held significant influence, control, or authority over another during a past period.
-
E.
strongestPartySince1983
Indicates that the referenced party has held its greatest level of strength (e.g., in votes, seats, or influence) at some point since the year 1983.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dd193108190af2528186f25b72a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a009f53a4948190aef4ede1713e1748 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 3:08 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a009edc53d4819080b22c1074a990f3 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 3:06 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:01 p.m.