Triple
T35067159
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Castle Lemongrab |
E1011760
|
entity |
| Predicate | languageWithin |
P18209
|
FINISHED |
| Object | English |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: English | Statement: [Castle Lemongrab, languageWithin, English]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageWithin Context triple: [Castle Lemongrab, languageWithin, English]
-
A.
languageWithinWork
Indicates that a specific language is used or contained within a particular work (such as a document, publication, or creative piece).
-
B.
languageUse
chosen
Indicates the language or languages an entity uses for communication, expression, or interaction.
-
C.
languageSpecifies
Indicates that one entity defines or constrains the syntax, semantics, or usage rules that govern how another language or linguistic system is expressed or interpreted.
-
D.
languageCategory
Indicates the classification relationship where a language is assigned to a particular linguistic or functional category.
-
E.
languageText
Indicates that a piece of text is expressed in, or associated with, a particular language.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dd193108190af2528186f25b72a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a00ac5654a0819090701f61a5802d64 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:03 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a00ab94b5e881909e15d1342e5f43be |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:01 p.m.