Triple

T35062252
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject BWV 847 E1011622 entity
Predicate hasTuningContext P119220 FINISHED
Object well-tempered tuning systems LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: well-tempered tuning systems | Statement: [BWV 847, hasTuningContext, well-tempered tuning systems]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTuningContext
Context triple: [BWV 847, hasTuningContext, well-tempered tuning systems]
  • A. usesTuningReference
    Indicates that one entity adopts another entity as the pitch or frequency standard for tuning.
  • B. hasTrackContext
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or occurs within a particular track-related context (such as a specific track, route, or sequence).
  • C. hasTuneOrigin
    Indicates that one entity’s tune or melody originates from, is derived from, or is based on another entity.
  • D. isTunedTo
    Indicates that one entity has been adjusted or configured to operate at, receive, or correspond to the frequency, channel, or setting of another entity.
  • E. tuningType chosen
    Indicates the specific method or configuration by which something is adjusted or calibrated to achieve a desired performance or behavior.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76dd09c308190a523454853ce842b completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7860db9a881909ff887028b57acde completed May 3, 2026, 5:29 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7841812f081909d878955d114088e completed May 3, 2026, 5:21 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:01 p.m.