Triple
T35057379
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Zendan-e Eskandar |
E1011503
|
entity |
| Predicate | materialEvidenceStatus |
P173817
|
FINISHED |
| Object | historical function debated by scholars |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: historical function debated by scholars | Statement: [Zendan-e Eskandar, materialEvidenceStatus, historical function debated by scholars]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: materialEvidenceStatus Context triple: [Zendan-e Eskandar, materialEvidenceStatus, historical function debated by scholars]
-
A.
hasMaterialEvidence
Indicates that there exists tangible, physical evidence supporting or associated with a particular entity, event, or claim.
-
B.
materialStatus
Indicates the current state or condition of a material, such as its availability, usage, or processing stage.
-
C.
evidenceAtIssue
chosen
Indicates that a particular piece of evidence is directly contested, disputed, or central to the disagreement or decision in a case or situation.
-
D.
presentsEvidenceTo
Indicates that one entity formally provides or shows evidence to another entity, typically to support a claim, argument, or decision.
-
E.
hasEvidenceItem
Indicates that there exists a specific piece of evidence supporting, illustrating, or justifying the associated entity or claim.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dd09c308190a523454853ce842b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f78ce78b508190955848e133398dc8 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:59 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f78b8f4cc08190b49fccd798cb25d7 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:53 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:01 p.m.