Triple
T35030858
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tamaran |
E1010475
|
entity |
| Predicate | inhabitantAbility |
P182808
|
FINISHED |
| Object | solar energy absorption |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: solar energy absorption | Statement: [Tamaran, inhabitantAbility, solar energy absorption]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: inhabitantAbility Context triple: [Tamaran, inhabitantAbility, solar energy absorption]
-
A.
believedToHaveAbility
Indicates that one entity is thought or assumed to possess a particular capability or power, without asserting that the ability is actually verified.
-
B.
actualAbility
Indicates that an entity truly possesses the capacity or power to perform a specified action or bring about a particular outcome, beyond mere potential or permission.
-
C.
sonAbility
Indicates that a son possesses or demonstrates a particular ability or capability in relation to another entity.
-
D.
hasCharacterAbility
Indicates that a character possesses or can perform a specific ability.
-
E.
hasProtagonistAbility
Indicates that a protagonist possesses a specific ability, power, or special skill.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dccf0108190af43b465d3750196 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7908ec35881909a42f954fb9fa16e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f78e2ac3fc819081a45c6841375c8d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:04 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f78fd3fd888190b7db0b563f298585 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:11 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:01 p.m.