Triple

T35014081
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mouse E1010006 entity
Predicate commonPlotMotif P41002 FINISHED
Object small character defeating larger foe LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: small character defeating larger foe | Statement: [Mouse, commonPlotMotif, small character defeating larger foe]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: commonPlotMotif
Context triple: [Mouse, commonPlotMotif, small character defeating larger foe]
  • A. featuresMotif chosen
    Indicates that something contains, incorporates, or prominently includes a particular recurring motif or pattern.
  • B. commonMotifRegion
    Indicates that two or more entities share a recurring motif within the same spatial or contextual region.
  • C. usesMotifsFrom
    Indicates that one entity incorporates or draws upon recurring themes, patterns, or elements that originate from another entity.
  • D. transformationMotif
    Indicates a recurring pattern or theme in which one entity undergoes a change in form, state, or identity in relation to another.
  • E. numberOfMotifs
    Indicates the count of distinct motifs associated with or contained within a given entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76dcc3ac8819096a3ed52f5fa2523 completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fec8aef1d8819094c7fd7074038e6b completed May 9, 2026, 5:39 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fec639876481908efd84a3631a4271 completed May 9, 2026, 5:29 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:01 p.m.