Triple
T35012124
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Auri-El |
E1009960
|
entity |
| Predicate | equivalentInPantheon |
P182002
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Akatosh |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Akatosh | Statement: [Auri-El, equivalentInPantheon, Akatosh]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: equivalentInPantheon Context triple: [Auri-El, equivalentInPantheon, Akatosh]
-
A.
equivalentInGreekReligion
Indicates that two religious figures, concepts, or practices are counterparts or direct analogues of each other within the context of Greek religion.
-
B.
equivalentInReligion
Indicates that two entities share the same or an essentially identical religious affiliation, tradition, or classification.
-
C.
equivalentInRomanMythology
Indicates that one entity corresponds to or is identified as the Roman-mythology counterpart of another entity from a different mythological tradition.
-
D.
equivalentInAztecPantheon
Indicates that one entity is considered the functional or symbolic counterpart of another within the Aztec pantheon.
-
E.
equivalentIn
Indicates that two entities are considered logically or functionally the same in meaning, status, or effect within a given context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dcc3ac8819096a3ed52f5fa2523 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7865578d48190bf90e470634fd97d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7841812f081909d878955d114088e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:21 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f78575917481909a3defd6a4c366bd |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:27 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:01 p.m.