Triple
T34997236
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Croatian checkerboard |
E1009571
|
entity |
| Predicate | visualMotifIn |
P29429
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Croatian tourism branding |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Croatian tourism branding | Statement: [Croatian checkerboard, visualMotifIn, Croatian tourism branding]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: visualMotifIn Context triple: [Croatian checkerboard, visualMotifIn, Croatian tourism branding]
-
A.
visualMetaphor
Indicates a relationship where one entity conceptually represents or explains another through a visual analogy or symbolic imagery.
-
B.
visualCompanion
Indicates that one entity serves as a visual counterpart, partner, or accompanying element to another in a visual context.
-
C.
visualAppeal
Indicates that one entity finds another entity aesthetically pleasing or visually attractive.
-
D.
visualExperience
Indicates a relationship where an entity undergoes or has a particular experience involving visual perception or seeing.
-
E.
visualElements
chosen
Indicates that one entity contains, uses, or is characterized by specific visual components or graphical features associated with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dca50dc8190b71f39defe186be8 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f78710282c81909146dc0be91e983f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f784162134819098413482ef52042f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:21 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:01 p.m.