Triple
T3499498
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Google Pixel 5 |
E73929
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsESIM |
P49173
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Google Pixel 5, supportsESIM, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsESIM Context triple: [Google Pixel 5, supportsESIM, yes]
-
A.
supportsEsim
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides compatibility with, or the ability to use, an embedded SIM (eSIM) for another entity.
-
B.
supportsRoamingWith
Indicates that one entity enables or is compatible with another entity’s ability to operate or be accessed while roaming across different networks or locations.
-
C.
hasSatelliteTerminal
Indicates that an entity is equipped with or connected to a satellite communication terminal.
-
D.
supportedIn
Indicates that one entity is valid, applicable, or functionally enabled within the context, environment, platform, or scope defined by another entity.
-
E.
hasNFC
Indicates that one entity possesses or supports Near Field Communication (NFC) capability in relation to another entity or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85cdb6e48190a335d412b9194ed8 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adbbd3ad548190abbfae820bf3b66d |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adb83270ac819083967db0570167d2 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:56 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:18 p.m.