Triple
T34986668
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Camp Holmes Treaty |
E1008967
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Native American–United States treaty |
C566
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Native American–United States treaty Context triple: [Camp Holmes Treaty, instanceOf, Native American–United States treaty]
-
A.
Indigenous–United States relations
Indigenous–United States relations encompass the historical and contemporary political, legal, social, and cultural interactions between Native American nations and the U.S. government, including treaties, conflicts, policies, and ongoing struggles for sovereignty and rights.
-
B.
Indigenous–Crown treaties in Canada
Indigenous–Crown treaties in Canada are formal agreements between Indigenous nations and the British Crown (and later the Canadian state) that define relationships, land use, rights, and mutual obligations, forming a foundational legal and political framework for the country.
-
C.
treaty
chosen
A treaty is a formal, legally binding agreement between two or more sovereign states or international entities that defines their mutual rights, obligations, and commitments.
-
D.
treaty area
A treaty area is a geographically defined region whose governance, resource use, or legal status is regulated by one or more formal agreements between sovereign entities or authorities.
-
E.
modern treaty government
A modern treaty government is a self-governing Indigenous political entity established through contemporary land claim and self-government agreements, exercising defined jurisdiction and authority recognized in Canadian constitutional and legal frameworks.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dc844a48190881951fffb83d17e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:01 p.m.