Triple
T34983599
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) |
E1008881
|
entity |
| Predicate | hearsAppealsFromDecisionsOf |
P122471
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Department for Work and Pensions |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Department for Work and Pensions | Statement: [First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support), hearsAppealsFromDecisionsOf, Department for Work and Pensions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hearsAppealsFromDecisionsOf Context triple: [First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support), hearsAppealsFromDecisionsOf, Department for Work and Pensions]
-
A.
hearsAppealsIn
Indicates that a judicial body has the authority to review and decide appeals within a specified jurisdiction or court.
-
B.
hearsAppealsBy
Indicates that one party has the authority or role to review and decide on appeals submitted by another party.
-
C.
hearsAppealsAgainst
chosen
Indicates that one entity formally reviews and considers appeals challenging the decisions or actions of another entity.
-
D.
hearsAppealTo
Indicates that one entity formally reviews and considers an appeal submitted by another entity.
-
E.
decidedAppealsFrom
Indicates that one judicial body reviewed and rendered decisions on appeals originating from another judicial body.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dc844a48190881951fffb83d17e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f78710282c81909146dc0be91e983f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f784162134819098413482ef52042f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:21 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:01 p.m.