Triple
T34982289
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Federation–Cardassian Treaty |
E1008846
|
entity |
| Predicate | sourceOfDispute |
P36329
|
FINISHED |
| Object | status of colonies inside the demilitarized zone |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: status of colonies inside the demilitarized zone | Statement: [Federation–Cardassian Treaty, sourceOfDispute, status of colonies inside the demilitarized zone]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sourceOfDispute Context triple: [Federation–Cardassian Treaty, sourceOfDispute, status of colonies inside the demilitarized zone]
-
A.
disputeOrigin
chosen
Indicates that there is disagreement or uncertainty about the source, cause, or initial point of something.
-
B.
disputeInvolves
Indicates that a particular dispute includes or concerns the specified entities as participants or parties to the conflict.
-
C.
originatingDispute
Indicates that one entity is the source, cause, or initial context of a particular dispute involving another entity.
-
D.
legalDisputeSubject
Indicates that a legal dispute concerns, involves, or is specifically about the referenced subject or matter.
-
E.
significantDispute
Indicates a serious, often prolonged disagreement or conflict exists between the involved entities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dc844a48190881951fffb83d17e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7979a073881909a4fde2558e6b6f3 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:44 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7961550f88190b7bb8a9155458b54 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:38 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:01 p.m.