Triple

T34980785
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Viktor Cherevin E1008807 entity
Predicate isCorrupt P182163 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Viktor Cherevin, isCorrupt, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isCorrupt
Context triple: [Viktor Cherevin, isCorrupt, true]
  • A. corrupts
    Indicates that one entity causes another entity, system, or process to become morally, functionally, or structurally degraded or impaired.
  • B. onCanaryCorruption
    Indicates that an entity experiences errors, instability, or data issues specifically in a canary (pre-production or limited-release) environment.
  • C. corruptedFormOf
    Indicates that one form of an expression, word, or name is a distorted, altered, or degraded version derived from another, more original form.
  • D. hasCorruptedMember
    Indicates that an entity includes or is associated with at least one member who is compromised, dishonest, or otherwise corrupted.
  • E. corruptingForceType
    Indicates a type or category of influence that causes moral, ethical, or structural degradation in the affected entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76dc844a48190881951fffb83d17e completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f78710282c81909146dc0be91e983f completed May 3, 2026, 5:34 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f784162134819098413482ef52042f completed May 3, 2026, 5:21 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f7870dfe108190996c0c68630edc7f completed May 3, 2026, 5:34 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:01 p.m.