Triple

T34965845
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Chicago high society E1008393 entity
Predicate hadSocialNorms P182146 FINISHED
Object strict etiquette LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: strict etiquette | Statement: [Chicago high society, hadSocialNorms, strict etiquette]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hadSocialNorms
Context triple: [Chicago high society, hadSocialNorms, strict etiquette]
  • A. attitudeTowardSocialNorms
    Indicates an entity’s stance, feelings, or orientation regarding prevailing social rules, expectations, or norms.
  • B. normativelyChallengedBy
    Indicates that one entity’s norms, standards, or prescriptions are questioned, disputed, or opposed by another entity.
  • C. levelOfNorm
    Indicates the degree or extent to which something conforms to a specified norm, standard, or expected behavior.
  • D. genderNorms
    Indicates socially constructed expectations or rules about how individuals should behave, appear, or identify based on their perceived gender.
  • E. hasReligiousNorm
    Indicates that one entity prescribes, embodies, or is governed by a religious rule, standard, or expectation in relation to another entity or context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76dc69564819099e9e78aed6ff0a6 completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f78710282c81909146dc0be91e983f completed May 3, 2026, 5:34 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f784162134819098413482ef52042f completed May 3, 2026, 5:21 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f7870dfe108190996c0c68630edc7f completed May 3, 2026, 5:34 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4 p.m.