Triple

T34964850
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Say Never E1008363 entity
Predicate hasNarrativeSelfReflexivity P199331 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Say Never, hasNarrativeSelfReflexivity, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNarrativeSelfReflexivity
Context triple: [Say Never, hasNarrativeSelfReflexivity, true]
  • A. hasNarrative
    Indicates that one entity contains, presents, or is associated with a story or narrative about another entity or subject.
  • B. containsNarrativeOf
    Indicates that one entity includes or presents the story, account, or narrative content of another entity.
  • C. hasNarrativeRole
    Indicates that an entity participates in a narrative with a specific functional role (e.g., protagonist, antagonist, narrator) relative to the story.
  • D. hasNarrativeContext
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, or situated within, a particular narrative or storytelling context that frames its meaning or role.
  • E. hasAbstractNarrative
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a non-literal, conceptual, or symbolic narrative rather than a concrete, straightforward account.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76dc69564819099e9e78aed6ff0a6 completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff2eb19ad88190915fbbe08e8bc84e completed May 9, 2026, 12:55 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff2db5dd608190b7b7ba95f19c276c completed May 9, 2026, 12:51 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ff2eb0c0888190b0e05a03bf06d388 completed May 9, 2026, 12:55 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4 p.m.