Triple
T34960228
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Earl of Hopetoun |
E1008232
|
entity |
| Predicate | subsequentCountry |
P67479
|
FINISHED |
| Object | United Kingdom |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United Kingdom | Statement: [Earl of Hopetoun, subsequentCountry, United Kingdom]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: subsequentCountry Context triple: [Earl of Hopetoun, subsequentCountry, United Kingdom]
-
A.
cedingCountry
Indicates the country that transfers or relinquishes control, ownership, or sovereignty over a territory, right, or asset to another party.
-
B.
previousCountry
chosen
Indicates that one country was the immediately preceding country associated with, visited by, or occupied by a given entity before its current country.
-
C.
countrySucceededBy
Indicates that one country is the direct successor state that replaces or follows another country in sovereignty or political continuity.
-
D.
endingCountry
Indicates the country in which an event, journey, process, or relationship comes to an end.
-
E.
cededToCountry
Indicates that control, ownership, or sovereignty over something was formally transferred from one country to another.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dc69564819099e9e78aed6ff0a6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f78710282c81909146dc0be91e983f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f784162134819098413482ef52042f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:21 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4 p.m.