Triple
T34957946
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rinax |
E1008169
|
entity |
| Predicate | celestialRelationship |
P165824
|
FINISHED |
| Object | moon of Talax |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: moon of Talax | Statement: [Rinax, celestialRelationship, moon of Talax]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: celestialRelationship Context triple: [Rinax, celestialRelationship, moon of Talax]
-
A.
inRelationshipWith
Indicates that two entities are mutually involved in a defined personal, romantic, or partnership relationship with each other.
-
B.
sexualRelationshipTo
Indicates that one entity has engaged in a sexual relationship or sexual activity with another entity.
-
C.
worksInCloseRelationshipWith
Indicates a collaborative professional relationship in which two or more entities work together closely and interact frequently to achieve shared goals.
-
D.
hasOrbitalRelationship
chosen
Indicates that one entity is in an orbital relationship with another, such as revolving around or being gravitationally bound in a regular orbit.
-
E.
basisOfRelationship
Indicates that one entity serves as the foundational reason, cause, or justification for the relationship that exists between two or more entities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dc69564819099e9e78aed6ff0a6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f78710282c81909146dc0be91e983f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f784162134819098413482ef52042f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:21 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4 p.m.