Triple

T34957588
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lineage E1008160 entity
Predicate portraysFutureChildOf P199202 FINISHED
Object B'Elanna Torres and Tom Paris NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: B'Elanna Torres and Tom Paris | Statement: [Lineage, portraysFutureChildOf, B'Elanna Torres and Tom Paris]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: portraysFutureChildOf
Context triple: [Lineage, portraysFutureChildOf, B'Elanna Torres and Tom Paris]
  • A. depictsChild
    Indicates that one entity visually represents or portrays another entity in the role or state of being a child.
  • B. portraysYoungerVersionOfCharacterFrom
    Indicates that one character is depicted as a younger version of another character from a specified source.
  • C. portraysFromAge
    Indicates that one entity depicts another entity starting from a specified age of the depicted entity.
  • D. portraysPregnancyOf
    Indicates that one entity visually or narratively represents the state of pregnancy of another entity.
  • E. willBeBornAs
    Indicates that an entity is predicted or destined to come into existence in the future as a particular individual or form.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76dc69564819099e9e78aed6ff0a6 completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff255b84788190a94682f4efe1d0b8 completed May 9, 2026, 12:15 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff24f3ab108190bb017a656cff3d82 completed May 9, 2026, 12:13 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ff255abca881908ef7635bd2e5af98 completed May 9, 2026, 12:15 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4 p.m.