Triple
T34956973
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Emacs package.el |
E1008142
|
entity |
| Predicate | storesPackagesIn |
P63988
|
FINISHED |
| Object | package-user-dir directory |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: package-user-dir directory | Statement: [Emacs package.el, storesPackagesIn, package-user-dir directory]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: storesPackagesIn Context triple: [Emacs package.el, storesPackagesIn, package-user-dir directory]
-
A.
storesInterfaceIn
Indicates that one entity keeps or maintains an interface definition within another entity (such as a container, module, or storage location).
-
B.
storesPackageStatusIn
Indicates that an entity records or maintains the status information of a package within a particular storage location or system.
-
C.
store
chosen
Indicates that one entity keeps or holds another entity in a place or system for future use or access.
-
D.
storesIndexesIn
Indicates that one entity maintains and holds index data within another storage entity or system.
-
E.
canBeStoredOn
Indicates that one entity is capable of being placed, kept, or maintained on another entity as a storage location.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dc69564819099e9e78aed6ff0a6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f78710282c81909146dc0be91e983f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f784162134819098413482ef52042f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:21 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4 p.m.