Triple
T34956667
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ring |
E1008136
|
entity |
| Predicate | requestKeyConvention |
P182125
|
FINISHED |
| Object | :request-method |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: :request-method | Statement: [Ring, requestKeyConvention, :request-method]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: requestKeyConvention Context triple: [Ring, requestKeyConvention, :request-method]
-
A.
namingConventionType
Indicates the specific style or set of rules used for naming entities or elements in a given context.
-
B.
namespaceConvention
Indicates the naming and structural rules that govern how namespaces are defined, organized, and referenced in a system.
-
C.
keyScheme
Indicates the cryptographic key structure or format used in establishing or managing a secure relationship between entities.
-
D.
typicalKey
Indicates that the referenced key is the standard or most commonly used key associated with an entity or context.
-
E.
mapConvention
Indicates a relationship where one representation or system is translated or aligned to another according to a defined set of mapping rules or conventions.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dc69564819099e9e78aed6ff0a6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f78710282c81909146dc0be91e983f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f784162134819098413482ef52042f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:21 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f7870dfe108190996c0c68630edc7f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:34 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4 p.m.