Triple
T34955712
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Remacs |
E1008117
|
entity |
| Predicate | reimplements |
P162147
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Emacs C core in Rust |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Emacs C core in Rust | Statement: [Remacs, reimplements, Emacs C core in Rust]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reimplements Context triple: [Remacs, reimplements, Emacs C core in Rust]
-
A.
overrides
Indicates that one entity replaces, supersedes, or takes precedence over another in determining the outcome or applicable behavior.
-
B.
alsoImplements
Indicates that an entity, in addition to its primary implementation, implements another interface, protocol, or specification as well.
-
C.
reimagines
Indicates that one entity creatively reconceives, interprets, or presents another in a significantly new or different way.
-
D.
alsoImplementedBy
Indicates that the same functionality, specification, or concept is realized or carried out by an additional implementation or agent beyond the primary one.
-
E.
alternativeImplementation
chosen
Indicates that one implementation serves as a substitute or different way of realizing the same functionality or specification as another implementation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dc69564819099e9e78aed6ff0a6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f78710282c81909146dc0be91e983f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f784162134819098413482ef52042f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:21 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4 p.m.