Triple
T34955305
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Micro Planner |
E1008108
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | symbolic programming language |
C1703
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: symbolic programming language Context triple: [Micro Planner, instanceOf, symbolic programming language]
-
A.
functional programming language
A functional programming language is a programming paradigm where computation is treated as the evaluation of mathematical functions, emphasizing immutability, first-class functions, and avoidance of side effects.
-
B.
programming language
chosen
A programming language is a formal system of syntax and semantics that allows humans to write instructions a computer can execute to perform specific tasks or solve problems.
-
C.
pioneer in symbolic computation
A pioneer in symbolic computation is an individual or entity that significantly advances the theory, algorithms, or systems enabling computers to manipulate and reason about mathematical symbols and expressions exactly rather than numerically.
-
D.
interpreted programming language
An interpreted programming language is a type of language whose source code is executed directly by an interpreter program, which reads and performs the instructions line by line without requiring prior compilation to machine code.
-
E.
programming language design
Programming language design is the process of defining the syntax, semantics, and features of a language to enable humans to express computations clearly, safely, and efficiently for execution by machines.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dc69564819099e9e78aed6ff0a6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4 p.m.