Triple
T34954508
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | LPPL |
E1008091
|
entity |
| Predicate | maintainerConcept |
P190384
|
FINISHED |
| Object | defines a maintainer for each work |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: defines a maintainer for each work | Statement: [LPPL, maintainerConcept, defines a maintainer for each work]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: maintainerConcept Context triple: [LPPL, maintainerConcept, defines a maintainer for each work]
-
A.
maintainedConcept
Indicates that an entity is responsible for preserving, managing, or keeping a particular concept up to date over time.
-
B.
listMaintainedBy
Indicates that a particular list is actively managed, updated, or overseen by a specified entity.
-
C.
oftenMaintainedBy
Indicates that something is regularly or frequently kept in working order, cared for, or updated by a particular agent or entity.
-
D.
maintainedBy (in-universe)
Indicates that something is kept in a particular state, condition, or operation through the ongoing efforts, care, or management of a specified agent within the fictional universe.
-
E.
maintainerOrganization
Indicates that an organization is responsible for maintaining, managing, or overseeing the ongoing support of a given entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dc5d4308190b77553ee07b1ede6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcc4b700748190ae00b21d09c96695 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 4:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcb0f9d3d881908a049475182fb039 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 3:34 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fcc4b5f22c8190b8b256adbdc2570c |
completed | May 7, 2026, 4:58 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4 p.m.