Triple
T34943502
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Magenta |
E1007790
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasFormerColonialPowerOfCountry |
P3075
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Netherlands |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Netherlands | Statement: [Magenta, hasFormerColonialPowerOfCountry, Netherlands]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFormerColonialPowerOfCountry Context triple: [Magenta, hasFormerColonialPowerOfCountry, Netherlands]
-
A.
wasColonialPower
chosen
Indicates that one entity historically exercised colonial control or dominance over another entity.
-
B.
hasColonialHistoryWith
Indicates that one entity has a historical relationship of colonization or being colonized involving the other entity.
-
C.
associatedWithSuccessorColonialPower
Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked or connected to a later colonial authority that succeeded a previous colonial power.
-
D.
partOfColonialEntity
Indicates that one entity is a constituent or subordinate territorial unit within a larger colonial political or administrative entity.
-
E.
usedByColonialPower
Indicates that something is employed or exploited as a tool, resource, or mechanism by a colonial power in the context of domination or control.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dc513fc819084a1ff52abbfa5bc |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe1fd637c08190aa95cd2478c278cb |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:39 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe19344bb481909b5e2144155e4add |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:11 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4 p.m.