Triple

T34930296
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Matadi–Kinshasa corridor E1007412 entity
Predicate gaugeOfRailComponent P47503 FINISHED
Object 1,067 mm LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1,067 mm | Statement: [Matadi–Kinshasa corridor, gaugeOfRailComponent, 1,067 mm]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: gaugeOfRailComponent
Context triple: [Matadi–Kinshasa corridor, gaugeOfRailComponent, 1,067 mm]
  • A. usesRailGauge
    Indicates that one entity (typically a railway system or line) operates using the specified rail gauge measurement of the other entity.
  • B. railwayGaugeContext chosen
    Indicates the specific track gauge standard or measurement that applies to, or is used in, a given railway-related context.
  • C. gaugeCompatibleWith
    Indicates that one gauge can be properly used with, mounted to, or function correctly in conjunction with another specified component or system.
  • D. gaugeType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of gauge associated with an entity or measurement.
  • E. gaugeGroup
    Indicates a relationship where a physical or theoretical model is associated with the gauge group that defines its underlying symmetry structure.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76dc3d83881909d5c3c14455cfa2c completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f782c98fa08190870b68de2c1ff26a completed May 3, 2026, 5:15 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f781020cc4819088c40cb8589504e4 completed May 3, 2026, 5:08 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4 p.m.