Triple
T34922891
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Leah Brahms (alternate timeline spouse) |
E1007194
|
entity |
| Predicate | futureRelationshipTo |
P115648
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Geordi La Forge |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Geordi La Forge | Statement: [Leah Brahms (alternate timeline spouse), futureRelationshipTo, Geordi La Forge]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: futureRelationshipTo Context triple: [Leah Brahms (alternate timeline spouse), futureRelationshipTo, Geordi La Forge]
-
A.
laterRelationshipWith
chosen
Indicates that one entity has a relationship with another that occurs at a later time relative to some reference point or prior relationship.
-
B.
laterRelationWith
Indicates that one entity stands in a temporal relationship to another such that it occurs or exists at a later time than the other.
-
C.
haveRelationshipWith
Indicates that one entity is in some form of defined relationship or association with another entity.
-
D.
relationshipPlannedWith
Indicates that a relationship between two entities has been intentionally arranged or scheduled to occur in the future.
-
E.
relationshipTarget
Indicates that an entity is the object or recipient toward which a specified relationship is directed.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dc2b6b0819095a61debbd405269 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f782c98fa08190870b68de2c1ff26a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f781020cc4819088c40cb8589504e4 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:08 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4 p.m.