Triple

T34910971
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 2014 Connecticut gubernatorial election E1006863 entity
Predicate mainOpponentGovernorCandidate P9213 FINISHED
Object Tom Foley NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tom Foley | Statement: [2014 Connecticut gubernatorial election, mainOpponentGovernorCandidate, Tom Foley]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mainOpponentGovernorCandidate
Context triple: [2014 Connecticut gubernatorial election, mainOpponentGovernorCandidate, Tom Foley]
  • A. opponentCandidate chosen
    Indicates that one entity is a rival or competing candidate against another in the same contest or election.
  • B. electionOpponent
    Indicates that two individuals are rivals competing against each other in the same election.
  • C. incumbentOpponent
    Indicates that one entity is the current officeholder while the other is their electoral challenger for that same position.
  • D. opponentRunningMate
    Indicates that one person is the running mate (e.g., vice-presidential or deputy candidate) of another person’s political opponent in an election.
  • E. opposedPartyNomineeOf
    Indicates that one entity is the official nominee of a party that is in opposition to another specified party or candidate.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76dc1b4a081909b4c6e4d8ec0aa2d completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f78710282c81909146dc0be91e983f completed May 3, 2026, 5:34 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f784162134819098413482ef52042f completed May 3, 2026, 5:21 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4 p.m.