Triple

T34899861
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Middle Sister Island E1006550 entity
Predicate hasNearbyCanadianProvince P201366 FINISHED
Object Ontario NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ontario | Statement: [Middle Sister Island, hasNearbyCanadianProvince, Ontario]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNearbyCanadianProvince
Context triple: [Middle Sister Island, hasNearbyCanadianProvince, Ontario]
  • A. adjacentToCanadianProvince
    Indicates that one entity is directly next to or shares a border with a Canadian province.
  • B. hasNearbyProvince
    Indicates that one province is geographically close to or directly adjacent to another province.
  • C. adjacentCanadianProvince
    Indicates that two entities are Canadian provinces that share a common land or maritime border.
  • D. bordersCanadianProvinceIndirectlyAcrossWater
    Indicates that one region is separated from a Canadian province only by a body of water, such that they face each other across water rather than sharing a direct land border.
  • E. nearProvince
    Indicates that one province is geographically close to or bordering another province.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76dbfe5788190ad8b64f241f470c8 completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ffed8912488190baa05f572e5b1b89 completed May 10, 2026, 2:29 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ffed12a76c8190ad85c6ac869c72e9 completed May 10, 2026, 2:27 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ffed884b908190b12422c790b1525e completed May 10, 2026, 2:29 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4 p.m.